||5R37CA222002-02 Interpret this number
||Rbhs-School Of Public Health
||Perceptions and Impact of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Communication Messages
Combustible cigarettes are the most deadly form of tobacco, but public misperceptions exist about the relative
risk of lower harm products such as snus and e-cigarettes. As such, tobacco control professionals have
advocated that smokers be better informed of these reduced risks given that this may facilitate switching to
these reduced risk products from combustible cigarettes, and subsequent harm-reduction benefits (e.g., lower
lung cancer risk). Tobacco companies are also beginning to apply to the FDA for permission to make reduced
risk claims in their advertising, and this trend is likely to continue as the industry moves the market towards
developing products with reduced risks relative to cigarettes. However, very little is known about how to
communicate reduced risk (RR) tobacco messages, where they should be placed, how consumers might
perceive them, and what their effects might be. Only a few studies have begun exploring the impact of RR
messages presented as a benefit claim on smokeless tobacco or e-cigarette advertisements, or presented
within a warning label that is required on ads. No studies have compared one approach versus the other, nor
their potentially different impacts on important outcomes such as perceived message source, credibility, recall,
risk perceptions, and use intentions. Similarly, little research exists on the impact of tobacco reduced risk
information included in educational types of materials, such as fact sheets. In contrast to ads, health education
materials may give consumers a fuller understanding of both the potential risks and risks relative to cigarettes,
and could be used by health organizations or act as packaging inserts. As such, the overall goal of this study is
to advance understanding of communication about reduced risk tobacco products. The specific aims are to: 1)
develop tobacco reduced risk messages for short and long communication formats; 2) compare the impact of
reduced risk messages presented as ad benefit claims versus within ad warning labels and 3) examine the
impact of snus and e-cigarette educational fact sheets with reduced risk information. This project aims to
address an important and timely research gap and produce high impact practical results that can immediately
be used to guide industry regulations on tobacco risk communication and the development of tobacco
educational materials that address relative tobacco product risks.
Characteristics of storefront tobacco advertisements and differences by product type: A content analysis of retailers in New York City, USA.
, Spillane T.E.
, Wong B.A.
, Wackowski O.A.
Preventive medicine, 2019 Jun; 123, p. 204-207.
Youth and young adult exposure to and perceptions of news media coverage about e-cigarettes in the United States, Canada and England.
, Sontag J.M.
, Hammond D.
Preventive medicine, 2019 04; 121, p. 7-10.
Smokers' perceptions of risks and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile analysis study.
, Ray A.E.
, Stapleton J.L.
Addictive behaviors, 2019 Apr; 91, p. 171-174.