Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
Grant Details

Grant Number: 1R21CA235352-01 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Myers, Chad
Organization: University Of Minnesota
Project Title: Integrative Methods for Finding Genetic Interactions Associated with Cancer Risk
Fiscal Year: 2019


Abstract

Project Summary The ability to inexpensively genotype individuals at high density across the human genome has enabled hundreds of genome-wide association studies that search for specific variants linked with diseases of interest. These efforts have been extremely productive in that they have produced large numbers of new candidate loci that were previously uncharacterized. However, for most diseases, the cumulative risk explained by the discovered loci explains only a small fraction of the estimated total disease heritability. One possible explanation is the potential for genetic interactions among variants. Most statistical geneticists agree that genetic interactions contribute to complex diseases, but traditional methods for identifying genetic interactions, which focus on testing individual locus pairs, lack statistical power due to the large number of possible variant combinations present within a human genome. Thus, if we hope to fully understand the complex genetics underlying human diseases, there is a critical need for new paradigms for identifying genetic interactions from population genetic data. A new perspective for approaching the problem of identifying genetic interactions emerges from extensive work in model organisms, where systematic efforts have constructed millions of double mutants using reverse genetic approaches over the past decade. One striking outcome of these studies is that genetic interactions are organized into highly structured sets, bridging or connecting all possible gene pairs that belong to functionally compensatory but distinct biological pathways. This exquisite structure can be exploited to help identify genetic interactions in humans. Based on this principle, we developed a novel computational approach, called BridGE, for discovering genetic interactions between pathways from human GWAS data. The specific objective of this application is to extend the BridGE algorithm to increase the utility of this promising approach for studying the genetic basis of cancer risk. We will accomplish this through two specific aims: (1) developing a context-sensitive BridGE algorithm that integrates tissue/cell-type specific functional genomic data to improve discovery of novel genetic interactions relevant to specific cancers; and (2) extend the BridGE algorithm to enable the analysis of genetic interactions involving somatic mutations. The proposed research is innovative because the completed method will provide a strong alternative to the prevailing paradigm for analysis of genome-wide association study data focused on single or sets of loci that are individually associated with disease risk. Our proposed approach offers a means to overcome a major statistical barrier and extract previously hidden genetic interactions contributing to cancer risk.



Publications

BridGE: a pathway-based analysis tool for detecting genetic interactions from GWAS.
Authors: Hajiaghabozorgi M. , Fischbach M. , Albrecht M. , Wang W. , Myers C.L. .
Source: Nature protocols, 2024-03-21; , .
EPub date: 2024-03-21.
PMID: 38514837
Related Citations

A method for benchmarking genetic screens reveals a predominant mitochondrial bias.
Authors: Rahman M. , Billmann M. , Costanzo M. , Aregger M. , Tong A.H.Y. , Chan K. , Ward H.N. , Brown K.R. , Andrews B.J. , Boone C. , et al. .
Source: Molecular systems biology, 2021 May; 17(5), p. e10013.
PMID: 34018332
Related Citations

Discovering genetic interactions bridging pathways in genome-wide association studies.
Authors: Fang G. , Wang W. , Paunic V. , Heydari H. , Costanzo M. , Liu X. , Liu X. , VanderSluis B. , Oately B. , Steinbach M. , et al. .
Source: Nature communications, 2019-09-19; 10(1), p. 4274.
EPub date: 2019-09-19.
PMID: 31537791
Related Citations




Back to Top