||5R01CA196759-04 Interpret this number
||Testing the Impact of Tobacco Product Graphic Warning Labels at Retail Point-of-Sale
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act required the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include warning statements and graphic warning labels on cigarette packages and in cigarette advertisements. In 2011, FDA published a final rule on the matter requiring color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of smoking with nine accompanying textual warning statements about the dangers of cigarettes. This rule was challenged in court by several tobacco companies, and after litigation, in 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the rule, stating that that FDA did not provide any "shred of evidence" that the graphic warning images would "reduce the number of Americans who smoke" (RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co v FDA, 696 F3d, 1205, 1219, DC Cir 2012). In March, 2013, the government decided not to seek further review of the Court's ruling and will likely only revisit the issue of graphic warning
labels if and when research shows that they have a positive impact on public health. Consequently, the FDA urgently needs rigorous tests of the impact of graphic warning labels on individuals' propensity to smoke. The overall aim of the proposed research is to experimentally test the impact of graphic warning labels on display in a tobacco powerwall in an experimental point-of-sale retail environment. Specifically, with funds from the National Cancer Institute (R01CA175209), we have created an experimental convenience store (a "StoreLab") that "sells" tobacco products (via a tobacco powerwall, behind the store cashier) in addition to other products typically found in convenience stores (e.g., soda, water, candy, etc.). Adult smokers, responding to ads for a study of "convenience store purchase patterns", will be randomly assigned to shop for $15 worth of products in the Storelab with a tobacco powerwall stocked with either (1) cigarette packages without graphic warning labels (GWLs-absent); or (2) cigarette packages with graphic warning labels (GWLs-present). Dependent measures will be behavioral (e.g., in-store tobacco purchases, "picking up" cessation pamphlets, time to next cigarette purchase, and self-reported changes in smoking at one week follow-up). We will also test the moderating role of individual difference variables that may alter how GWLs impact behavior. The StoreLab will also be equipped with state-of-the-art, commercially available systems for recording and analyzing participant attention and emotional reactions (coded with Eckman's Facial Coding Action System) to graphic warning labels as they encounter them in our experimental yet ecologically valid point-of-sale environment. The results of this experiment will provide new and needed information to FDA about the value of adding graphic warning labels to cigarette packages available for purchase in typical retail environments.
Do graphic health warning labels on cigarette packages deter purchases at point-of-sale? An experiment with adult smokers.
, Martino S.C.
, Setodji C.M.
, Dunbar M.
, Scharf D.
, Creswell K.G.
Health education research, 2019-06-01; 34(3), p. 321-331.
Zonnic®: a new player in an old field.
, Dunbar M.S.
, Setodji C.
, Shadel W.G.
Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2017-09-06; 12(1), p. 40.