Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA188892-05 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Crain, A
Organization: Healthpartners Institute
Project Title: Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: a Smart Approach to Enhancing Weight Loss
Fiscal Year: 2018


DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends referral to behavioral weight loss programs to help obese adults achieve a clinically meaningful weight loss of 8-10% of starting body weight. However, response heterogeneity is observed with half of participants unable to achieve this goal. Despite this heterogeneity, a "one size fits all" approach is the norm, a major drawback because non-response can in fact be detected early. This gap in weight loss intervention science calls for an adaptive intervention approach that could provide the "right treatment at the right time for the right person". Adaptive interventions individualize treatment through empirically-supported decision rules advising when and how treatments should unfold over time to maximize effectiveness. Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMART), developed explicitly to build optimal adaptive interventions, use experimental design principles to develop these decision rules. This application is responsive to "PA-13-165: Innovative Research Methods: Prevention and Management of Symptoms in Chronic Illness" and is the first we are aware of to apply this innovative methodological approach to adult weight loss. We propose a SMART to systematically evaluate therapeutic approach and timing variations for intervening with non-responders. Decisions about altering therapeutic strategy should take into consideration the reasons people struggle with weight loss. Self-regulation challenges have been identified as a major adherence barrier. Two attractive options to address self-regulation difficulties are: 1) augmenting behavioral treatment with Meal Replacements (MR) which decreases the need for self-regulation; and 2) switching therapeutic approaches by teaching acceptance and commitment skills (ACT) which boost capacity for self-regulation. Additionally, two time points for intervening with non-responders will be evaluated: 1) 5 weeks, based on emerging weight loss trial evidence; and 2) 10 weeks, based on average duration used in the extant stepped care literature. Adults (n=500) with 30 kg/m2 d BMI d 45 kg/m2 will be recruited and will receive individual behavioral weight loss treatment (BWL). Participants will be randomized to either: 1) treatment response assessment at 5 weeks or 2) treatment response assessment at 10 weeks. Participants identified as non-responders at Week 5 and Week 10 will be re-randomized to either: "Augment with Meal Replacements" or "Switch to ACT". Participants identified as responders continue with BWL. All participants receive 6 months of intervention; research assessments take place at baseline, 6- and 18-months. The primary aim is to evaluate the benefit of augmenting treatment with MR's versus switching to ACT for non-responders. The secondary aim is to evaluate the optimal time to intervene with non-responders. These SMART results will lead to the empirically supported construction of an individualized adaptive intervention that will optimize weight loss outcomes and associated health benefits for obese adults.


BestFIT Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Results: A SMART Approach to Developing Individualized Weight Loss Treatment Sequences.
Authors: Sherwood N.E. , Crain A.L. , Seburg E.M. , Butryn M.L. , Forman E.M. , Crane M.M. , Levy R.L. , Kunin-Batson A.S. , Jeffery R.W. .
Source: Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022-03-01; 56(3), p. 291-304.
PMID: 34415011
Related Citations

Association of childhood abuse with behavioral weight-loss outcomes: Examining the mediating effect of binge eating severity.
Authors: Emery Tavernier R.L. , Mason S.M. , Levy R.L. , Seburg E.M. , Sherwood N.E. .
Source: Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2022 Jan; 30(1), p. 96-105.
PMID: 34932887
Related Citations

Discrepancies Between Clinician and Participant Intervention Adherence Ratings Predict Percent Weight Change During a Six-Month Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention.
Authors: Berry M.P. , Seburg E.M. , Butryn M.L. , Jeffery R.W. , Crane M.M. , Levy R.L. , Forman E.M. , Sherwood N.E. .
Source: Translational behavioral medicine, 2021-04-26; 11(4), p. 1006-1014.
PMID: 33739425
Related Citations

Using targeting to recruit men and women of color into a behavioral weight loss trial.
Authors: Crane M.M. , Seburg E.M. , Levy R.L. , Jeffery R.W. , Sherwood N.E. .
Source: Trials, 2020-06-16; 21(1), p. 537.
EPub date: 2020-06-16.
PMID: 32546253
Related Citations

Depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, and binge eating in individuals seeking behavioral weight loss treatment.
Authors: Godfrey K.M. , Butryn M.L. , Forman E.M. , Martinez M. , Roberts S.R. , Sherwood N.E. .
Source: Journal of contextual behavioral science, 2019 Oct; 14, p. 50-54.
EPub date: 2019-09-27.
PMID: 32864324
Related Citations

The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments.
Authors: Sherwood N.E. , Butryn M.L. , Forman E.M. , Almirall D. , Seburg E.M. , Lauren Crain A. , Kunin-Batson A.S. , Hayes M.G. , Levy R.L. , Jeffery R.W. .
Source: Contemporary clinical trials, 2016 Mar; 47, p. 209-16.
EPub date: 2016-01-26.
PMID: 26825020
Related Citations

Back to Top