Skip to main content
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01HG008605-03 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Wolf, Susan
Organization: University Of Minnesota
Project Title: LAWSEQ: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics Into Clinical Application
Fiscal Year: 2018
Back to top


Abstract

? DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This 3-year R01 based at the University of Minnesota and Vanderbilt University will convene a national Working Group of top legal and scientific experts to analyze current U.S. federal and state law, regulation, and guidance on translational genomics, and to generate consensus recommendations on what the law should be, to optimize successful translation of genomics into clinical use. The law underlying genomics is currently unclear, poorly understood, and contested. As this technology is now poised for wide clinical integration, legal scholars need to work with genomics experts to build the required legal foundation. Work is especially needed in 4 domains, the law of: Liability, Quality of sequencing and interpretation, Privacy & Access to genomic results, and the overarching Framework clarifying when research rules vs. clinical rules apply. Aim 1 of this project is to build a searchable public online Database of state and federal statutes, regulation, case law, plus official guidance and standards, and an Annotated Bibliography of core literature-a map of what current genomics law "is." The project will use established legal search methods and analysis to construct the Database, working with a professional web design firm to construct a highly functional, durable, and free public resource. We will use multiple search methods to build the Bibliography, posting it online for free access. Aim 2 is to use mixed methods to ascertain stakeholder views of the law and generate rich inputs to inform a systematic Working Group process generating consensus recommendations on what the law undergirding translational genomics should be. Led by a senior social scientist, the team will use a modified Delphi method to elicit views of Working Group experts on issue priorities. To systematically capture a wide range of stakeholder views on issues and potential solutions, the project will use a streamlined survey and interview process. We will use an online REDCap(tm) survey to identify the perspectives of NIH-funded genomics investigators, legal counsel, industry representatives, genomics clinic directors, professional society leaders, and government authorities. We will also conduct semi-structured interviews with qualitative content analysis of the transcripts to capture more fully the views of a sample of legal counsel and government authorities. Informed by these rich inputs, the Working Group will pursue a structured process of analysis and consensus building that is well-established in law and bioethics. Each of 4 Task Forces will generate consensus recommendations, reporting to the full Working Group for feedback and project coordination. We will seek feedback on our recommendations from a subset of survey and interview respondents plus other expert readers, and through a major public conference. Project products will include: the online legal Database and Annotated Bibliography, 4 Task Force papers with consensus analysis and recommendations, individual targeted articles, published empirical analyses, a videotaped public conference, a symposium issue of a peer-reviewed journal presenting project publications, online access to our work, and wide dissemination.

Back to top


Publications

Return of results and data to study participants.
Authors: Wolf S.M. , Evans B.J. .
Source: Science (new York, N.y.), 2018-10-12 00:00:00.0; 362(6411), p. 159-160.
PMID: 30309935
Related Citations

Response to Dreyfus and Sobel.
Authors: Evans B.J. .
Source: American Journal Of Human Genetics, 2018-07-05 00:00:00.0; 103(1), p. 166-168.
PMID: 29979982
Related Citations

Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance.
Authors: Burke W. , Beskow L.M. , Trinidad S.B. , Fullerton S.M. , Brelsford K. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 79-86.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 29962827
Related Citations

Capacity, Vulnerability, and Informed Consent for Research.
Authors: Biros M. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 72-78.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 29991882
Related Citations

Where Did Informed Consent for Research Come From?
Authors: Capron A.M. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 12-29.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30008545
Related Citations

Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.
Authors: Wolf S.M. , Scholtes E. , Koenig B.A. , Petersen G.M. , Berry S.A. , Beskow L.M. , Daly M.B. , Fernandez C.V. , Green R.C. , LeRoy B.S. , et al. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 87-109.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30008546
Related Citations

Avoiding Exploitation in Phase I Clinical Trials: More than (Un)Just Compensation.
Authors: Lamkin M. , Elliott C. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 52-63.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30026654
Related Citations

The Ethics of Using Complementary Medicine in Pediatric Oncology Trials: Reconciling Challenges.
Authors: Porter A.S. , Kodish E. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 64-71.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30026655
Related Citations

Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.
Authors: Vayena E. , Blasimme A. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 119-129.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30034208
Related Citations

Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.
Authors: Gehlert S. , Mozersky J. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2018 Mar; 46(1), p. 30-43.
EPub date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30093794
Related Citations

HIPAA's Individual Right of Access to Genomic Data: Reconciling Safety and Civil Rights.
Authors: Evans B.J. .
Source: American Journal Of Human Genetics, 2018-01-04 00:00:00.0; 102(1), p. 5-10.
PMID: 29304376
Related Citations

The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.
Authors: Wolf S.M. .
Source: The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal Of The American Society Of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017 Sep; 45(3), p. 333-340.
EPub date: 2017-10-18 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 30100701
Related Citations

Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium.
Authors: Wolf S.M. , Amendola L.M. , Berg J.S. , Chung W.K. , Clayton E.W. , Green R.C. , Harris-Wai J. , Henderson G.E. , Jarvik G.P. , Koenig B.A. , et al. .
Source: Genetics In Medicine : Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics, 2017-08-31 00:00:00.0; , .
EPub date: 2017-08-31 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 28858330
Related Citations

The need to develop a patient-centered precision medicine model for adults with chronic disability.
Authors: Wolf S.M. , Thyagarajan B. , Fogel B.L. .
Source: Expert Review Of Molecular Diagnostics, 2017 May; 17(5), p. 415-418.
EPub date: 2017-04-03 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 28325089
Related Citations




Back to Top