||5R03CA204825-02 Interpret this number
||Harvard School Of Public Health
||Weight Cycling and Total and Site-Specific Cancer Incidence and Mortality
A modifiable risk factor that is highly prevalent in populations translates into a substantial number of cases that
can be prevented through clinical and public health interventions targeting the risk factor. In the field of cancer
research, weight cycling represents a potential modifiable risk factor that is highly prevalent but under-
investigated. Albeit limited, available evidence suggests that weight cycling, characterized by repeated
episodes of intentional weight loss followed by regain of weight, may promote the development and
progression of cancers through the insulin pathway, particularly among individuals of normal weight
who are generally conceived as healthy and at lower risk for obesity-related cancer endpoints. The
Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) and Nurses' Health Study (NHS) are among the few cohorts to
have administered questionnaires specifically designed to examine health consequences of weight
cycling and thus, are equipped to examine not only its effects on cancer incidence and mortality but also the
following heterogeneous aspects of the relationships. With available information on weight cycling
experience over different durations and timing in adulthood, Aim 1 will identify the etiologically relevant
period of weight cycling, which informs the optimal timing of public health interventions. Aim 2 will examine the
relationship by subtypes of weight cyclers defined by methods used to lose weight. Exercise, without caloric
restriction, is not an effective method of weight loss, but it has many health benefits. By specifically comparing
the risks of cancer endpoints between the two weight loss regimes (caloric restriction alone versus caloric
restriction and exercise combined), this aim will identify the weight loss regime that would minimize the
adverse consequences of weight cycling on cancer endpoints. Additionally, by conducting stratified analysis
by smoking status, Aim 2 will adequately evaluate the true associations of weight cycling with cancer
incidence and mortality, minimizing smoking from distorting or masking the associations. Aim 3 will utilize
stratified analysis across three adiposity trajectories (maintain normal range, maintain
overweight/obesity, and become overweight/obesity), which offers a unique opportunity to identify a novel
and modifiable risk factor for individuals with normal adiposity who are generally considered to have lower
baseline risk for obesity-related cancers. In summary, weight cycling represents a full picture of energy
imbalance over time and thus, research on weight cycling will complement limitations of previous studies on
either weight gain or intentional weight loss alone. If weight cycling is demonstrated to be an independent risk
factor for cancer incidence and mortality, clinical practice and public health recommendation should emphasize
sustainable weight loss when guiding individuals attempting to lose weight and discourage approaches that
predispose to weight cycling.
Association between weight cycling and risk of kidney cancer: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of observational studies.
, Keum N.
, Rezende L.F.M.
, Tabung F.K.
, Hong S.
, Giovannucci E.L.
Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021 Sep; 32(9), p. 1029-1038.
Elucidating Under-Studied Aspects of the Link Between Obesity and Multiple Myeloma: Weight Pattern, Body Shape Trajectory, and Body Fat Distribution.
, Suppan C.A.
, Giovannucci E.
, Song M.
, Kværner A.S.
, Townsend M.K.
, Rosner B.A.
, Rebbeck T.R.
, Colditz G.A.
, Birmann B.M.
JNCI cancer spectrum, 2019 Sep; 3(3), p. pkz044.