DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Eating ample amounts of fruits and vegetables (F&V) is associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases such as many cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and type 2 diabetes. Cost-effective nutrition education approaches to help large and diverse segments of the population to eat more F&V are greatly needed. The worksite is a promising channel for such interventions. The proposed research will study the efficacy of innovative worksite interventions to improve F&V consumption of employees by building upon a successful pilot intervention - the Fresh Initiative. This pilot is a partnership with a private F&V distribution company, Brown University, the RI Department of Health and the Worksite Wellness Council of RI to regularly deliver low-cost, fresh F&V to the worksite. Twenty four worksites will be randomized to one of three experimental groups as discussed below. Employee F&V consumption will be measured at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. The primary Specific Aims of this proposed research are to employ a group randomized trial to study the efficacy of: 1 An intervention to deliver fresh F&V at reduced prices for purchase at worksites on increasing employees' F&V consumption (Access intervention A) compared to a Comparison (C) intervention (A vs. C.); 2. Interventions to change the information and social environments at the worksite (B) combined with the F&V delivery intervention alone (A) on increasing employees' F&V consumption (Enhanced intervention) compared to a Comparison intervention. (A+B vs. C); 3 The Enhanced intervention on increasing employees' F&V consumption compared to the Access intervention alone. (A+B vs. A). Secondary aims include: 1. To implement extensive implementation process evaluation to determine costs, reach, fidelity and dose; 2. To use a mediating variable framework to examine relationships among important psychosocial factors/determinants with changes in F&V consumption; 3. To compare changes in employee productivity from baseline to 6, 12, and 18 months by experimental condition; 4. To compare the efficacy of the above interventions 6 months after the active intervention period ends (18 months after baseline); 5. To compare the cost effectiveness of the Comparison, Access and Enhanced interventions related to change in F&V consumption.
Error Notice
The database may currently be offline for maintenance and should be operational soon. If not, we have been notified of this error and will be reviewing it shortly.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
- The DCCPS Team.