Grant Details
Grant Number: |
1R15CA156098-01 Interpret this number |
Primary Investigator: |
Xirasagar, Sudha |
Organization: |
University Of South Carolina At Columbia |
Project Title: |
Reducing Cancer Disparities: Incident Cancer After Colonoscopies By Primary Care |
Fiscal Year: |
2011 |
Abstract
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This project explores a key knowledge gap regarding the quality and colorectal cancer (CRC) protection effect of primary care physician (PCP)-performed colonoscopies under a innovative program in South Carolina that trains and utilizes primary care physicians (PCP) for colonoscopy screening. The program uses a unique clinical protocol, with inbuilt quality safeguards to compensate for PCPs' lack of formal gastroenterology training. A previous NCI-funded study documented the high quality and patient safety of PCP-performed colonoscopies, providing the evidence base for the clinical effectiveness of PCP-colonoscopies performed in a structured setting. The same study also found significantly higher colonoscopy rates among patients of trained AA PCPs relative to untrained PCPs, an increase that was led by drastic increases among AAs, particularly AA men. Though promising, questions remain to be addressed before this innovative program can be scaled up to expand colonoscopy access for AAs. The questions are: a) Do PCPs' adenoma/cancer yield rates and procedure performance indicators match those of specialists performing colonoscopies in the same clinical setting and screening patients drawn from the same population? This study aim will clarify the performance quality of PCP-colonoscopies accounting for potential confounding due to unobserved population-related variables. b) Do PCPs confer similar CRC protection rates as specialists serving the same population, and do PCP-cohort protection rates compare well with the CRC protection rates found in randomized clinical trials? This study will investigate these questions using data on 13,688 screening colonoscopies by 54 PCPs and on 5031 colonoscopies by 5 specialists. To detect differences in performance quality and case yield rates we will compare PCP-performed procedures with specialist-performed procedures on the following metrics: a) polyp detection rate and mean polyps detected per patient, b) adenoma detection rate and mean adenomas per patient, c) advanced adenoma detection rate and mean per patient, d) cancer detection rate, e) location of detected adenomas - right-sided, left-sided and cecal adenomas, f) colonoscope insertion and withdrawal times when no polyp was found and when polyp(s) were found, g) cecal intubation rate, h) reasons for incomplete colonoscopies (not achieving cecal intubation), i) repeat colonoscopy due to unsatisfactory procedure, and j) all of the above indicators classified by PCPs' training status and procedure volume. To satisfy study aim 2 we will assess the number and type of incident cancers among PCP- vs. specialist-served cohorts (65,685 person years (PYO) from 13,688 PCP colonoscopies, and 34,255 PYOs from the 5031 specialist-performed colonoscopies). We will source cancer data from the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry (SCCCR) and death data from the SC Vital Statistics registry. We will classify incident cancers by probable cause as per the documented algorithm (Pabby et al) into 4 categories: missed cancer, new cancer, incomplete removal, failed biopsy detection, and incomplete colonoscopy.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This project explores a key knowledge gap regarding the performance quality and colorectal cancer (CRC) protection effect of colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians (PCP) under a innovative program (with inbuilt quality assurance mechanisms to compensate for PCPs' lack of formal gastroenterology training) in South Carolina. The study will explore: a) whether the PCP-colonoscopy cohort rates of precancerous adenomas and cancer, and other quality measures are comparable to those of the specialist cohort performed in the same clinical setting and population, and b) whether PCP-performed colonoscopies confer similar CRC protection on patients as specialists, and as per the documented rates in randomized clinical trials. It will use colonoscopy and cancer registry data pertaining to 65,685 person years (PYO) of follow-up following 13,688 PCP colonoscopies, and 34,255 PYOs following 5031 specialist-performed colonoscopies.
Publications
Colorectal Cancer Prevention by CLEAR Principles-based Colonoscopy Protocol: An Observational Study.
Authors: Xirasagar S.
, Wu Y.
, Tsai M.H.
, Zhang J.
, Chiodini S.
, de Groen P.C.
.
Source: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2019-12-06 00:00:00.0; , .
EPub date: 2019-12-06 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 31816316
Related Citations
Travel distance to screening facilities and completion of abnormal mammographic follow-up among disadvantaged women.
Authors: Khang L.
, Adams S.A.
, Steck S.E.
, Zhang J.
, Xirasagar S.
, Daguise V.G.
.
Source: Annals Of Epidemiology, 2017 01; 27(1), p. 35-41.
EPub date: 2016-08-31 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 27729181
Related Citations
Authors' response to Eluri et al. letter to the editor regarding: Colorectal cancer prevention by an optimized colonoscopy protocol in routine practice.
Authors: Xirasagar S.
, de Groen P.C.
.
Source: International Journal Of Cancer, 2015-09-01 00:00:00.0; 137(5), p. 1247-8.
EPub date: 2015-09-01 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 25663089
Related Citations
Decreased Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios with Increased Accessibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Authors: Adams S.A.
, Choi S.K.
, Khang L.
, A Campbell D.
, Friedman D.B.
, Eberth J.M.
, Glasgow R.E.
, Tucker-Seeley R.
, Xirasagar S.
, Yip M.P.
, et al.
.
Source: Journal Of Community Health, 2015 Aug; 40(4), p. 633-41.
PMID: 25634545
Related Citations
Colonoscopy screening among US adults aged 40 or older with a family history of colorectal cancer.
Authors: Tsai M.H.
, Xirasagar S.
, Li Y.J.
, de Groen P.C.
.
Source: Preventing Chronic Disease, 2015-05-21 00:00:00.0; 12, p. E80.
EPub date: 2015-05-21 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 25996988
Related Citations
Colorectal cancer prevention by an optimized colonoscopy protocol in routine practice.
Authors: Xirasagar S.
, Li Y.J.
, Hurley T.G.
, Tsai M.H.
, Hardin J.W.
, Hurley D.M.
, Hebert J.R.
, de Groen P.C.
.
Source: International Journal Of Cancer, 2015-03-15 00:00:00.0; 136(6), p. E731-42.
EPub date: 2015-03-15 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 25242510
Related Citations
Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal.
Authors: de Groen P.C.
, Li Y.J.
, Xirasagar S.
.
Source: The New England Journal Of Medicine, 2014-11-20 00:00:00.0; 371(21), p. 2035.
PMID: 25409379
Related Citations
Reducing Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Disparities: Performance and Outcomes of a Screening Colonoscopy Program in South Carolina.
Authors: Xirasagar S.
, Li Y.J.
, Burch J.B.
, Daguisé V.G.
, Hurley T.G.
, Hébert J.R.
.
Source: Advances In Public Health, 2014; 2014, .
PMID: 25705719
Related Citations
Diagnostic And Demographic Differences Between Incarcerated And Nonincarcerated Youth (ages 6-15) With Adhd In South Carolina
Authors: Soltis S.L.
, Probst J.
, Xirasagar S.
, Martin A.B.
, Smith B.H.
.
Source: Journal Of Attention Disorders, 2013-10-16 00:00:00.0; , .
PMID: 24131893
Related Citations
Colonoscopy screening rates among patients of colonoscopy-trained African American primary care physicians.
Authors: Xirasagar S.
, Hurley T.G.
, Burch J.B.
, Mansaray A.
, Hébert J.R.
.
Source: Cancer, 2011-11-15 00:00:00.0; 117(22), p. 5151-60.
EPub date: 2011-11-15 00:00:00.0.
PMID: 21523762
Related Citations