Grant Details
Grant Number: |
5R01CA095594-04 Interpret this number |
Primary Investigator: |
Pasick, Rena |
Organization: |
University Of California, San Francisco |
Project Title: |
Cross-Cultural Communication and Colorectal Screening |
Fiscal Year: |
2004 |
Abstract
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Among the cancer screening tests known to
significantly reduce mortality, screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is
utilized least. Rates of CRC screening are lowest among the underserved, those
who are non-white or non-English speaking and/or of low socioeconomic status.
Late stage diagnosis for CRC is more common among African Americans, Asians,
and Hispanics than non-Hispanic whites. More than other cancer screening tests,
CRC screening is dependent upon effective communication between provider and
patient, an interaction that can be problematic under any circumstance but is
further complicated when provider and patient are from different cultures. The
proposed research represents the formative phase of an intervention to adapt
electronic tailoring to produce guidelines and messages that will aid providers
in effective communication across cultures on CRC screening. Our specific aims
are, for African American, Latino and Vietnamese patients, to: 1.) Identify the
cultural, social, and psychological factors that influence the effectiveness of
provider-patient communication on CRC screening; 2.) Develop and test
communication strategies that enable providers to bridge the most important
cultural, social and psychological differences for a CRC screening referral;
3.) Develop a research plan for a controlled trial of tailored provider-patient
communication across cultures regarding CRC screening. The conceptual framework
for the study draws from subjective culture theory, communication theory and
behavior science theory. This three-year qualitative study consists of two
phases of research. Phase I, Concept Identification, will include 20-40
video-taped observations of actual provider-patient visits in which the
physician recommends CRC screening, followed by unstructured interviews with
the patients. Phase I also includes 4 provider focus groups; key informant
interviews with experts on the three targeted cultures; and 8 patient focus
groups, 2 in each of the 3 targeted culture and two with Anglos. Phase II,
Refinement and Testing of provider guidelines and messages will include another
set of 8 patient focus groups and a round of 10-20 observations to pilot test
guidelines and messages. Results will inform an intervention to be tested in a
subsequent study.
Publications
Physicians' Approaches To Recommending Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study
Authors: Walsh J.M.
, Karliner L.
, Burke N.
, Somkin C.P.
, Pham L.A.
, Pasick R.
.
Source: Journal Of Cancer Education : The Official Journal Of The American Association For Cancer Education, 2010 Sep; 25(3), p. 385-90.
PMID: 20204571
Related Citations
Considering Culture In Physician-- Patient Communication During Colorectal Cancer Screening
Authors: Ge Gao null
, Burke N.
, Somkin C.P.
, Pasick R.
.
Source: Qualitative Health Research, 2009 Jun; 19(6), p. 778-89.
PMID: 19363141
Related Citations