Skip to main content

COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.

What people with cancer should know: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus

Guidance for cancer researchers: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus-researchers

Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.covid19.nih.gov

Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA085819-05 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Stone, Arthur
Organization: State University New York Stony Brook
Project Title: Utility of Momentary Versus Recalled Self Reports
Fiscal Year: 2004


Abstract

DESCRIPTION (Adapted from the Applicant's Abstract): This proposal was prepared in response to NIH Program Announcement (PA-98-031) entitled "Methodology and measurement in the behavioral and social sciences." Research on autobiographical memory has shown that numerous cognitive processes have the potential to bias retrospective reports of personal experiences. Behavioral and medical scientists and practitioners rely heavily on recall procedures in their research endeavors and for treating patients. Measures of symptoms, pain, treatment efficacy, adherence, and traumatic experiences, for example, are typically based on retrospective data, sometimes for periods of several months or even years. The primary aims of this proposal involve comparing assessments of momentary experiences, based on a procedure we have called Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), with those of recalled experiences in an effort to determine 1) the relationship between the two types of data and 2) the meaning and practical utility of each type of data. The first aim seeks to understand how people summarize their experiences and create a recall. It will also explore situational influences and characteristics of the person that influence recall ratings. The second aim is grounded in the hypothesis that summaries of experiences based upon momentary ratings versus recall carry information that may be useful for different purposes, which could have important theoretical and practical consequences for scientists and practitioners. Secondary aims investigate several methodological issues pertain to the conduct of EMA studies including potential reactivity effects, participant burden, frequency of momentary sampling, optimal statistical methods for analyzing EMA data, and methods for improving recall of experiences. Outcome variables for testing these questions are mood and pain. Both are constructs with wide basic and applied utility in behavioral and medical domains. These measures will be intensively examined in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, some with recent diagnoses and others with chronic conditions in order to ensure variability in mood and pain over time. Results from these studies should have implications for understanding the meaning of recalled mood and pain measures, addressing the questions: how do people summarize their experiences and what factors influence those summaries? They will also increase knowledge about when momentary versus recalled summary measures should be used for addressing basic and applied questions. Finally, the study will provide practical information for researchers using momentary assessment methods.



Publications

Temporal dynamics of pain: an application of regime-switching models to ecological momentary assessments in patients with rheumatic diseases.
Authors: Schneider S. , Junghaenel D.U. , Ono M. , Stone A.A. .
Source: Pain, 2018 Jul; 159(7), p. 1346-1358.
PMID: 29557930
Related Citations

Single momentary assessments are not reliable outcomes for clinical trials.
Authors: Stone A.A. , Broderick J.E. , Kaell A.T. .
Source: Contemporary clinical trials, 2010 Sep; 31(5), p. 466-72.
EPub date: 2010-05-23.
PMID: 20580945
Related Citations

The association of depression and neuroticism with pain reports: a comparison of momentary and recalled pain assessment.
Authors: Raselli C. , Broderick J.E. .
Source: Journal of psychosomatic research, 2007 Mar; 62(3), p. 313-20.
PMID: 17324682
Related Citations

Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects--Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006).
Authors: Broderick J.E. , Stone A.A. .
Source: Psychological methods, 2006 Mar; 11(1), p. 106-11; discussion 123-5.
PMID: 16594770
Related Citations

Recalled pain ratings: a complex and poorly defined task.
Authors: Broderick J.E. , Stone A.A. , Calvanese P. , Schwartz J.E. , Turk D.C. .
Source: The journal of pain, 2006 Feb; 7(2), p. 142-9.
PMID: 16459280
Related Citations

Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic.
Authors: Stone A.A. , Schwartz J.E. , Broderick J.E. , Shiffman S.S. .
Source: Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2005 Oct; 31(10), p. 1340-6.
PMID: 16143666
Related Citations

Associations among pain intensity, sensory characteristics, affective qualities, and activity limitations in patients with chronic pain: a momentary, within-person perspective.
Authors: Litcher-Kelly L. , Stone A.A. , Broderick J.E. , Schwartz J.E. .
Source: The journal of pain, 2004 Oct; 5(8), p. 433-9.
PMID: 15501425
Related Citations

Signaling does not adequately improve diary compliance.
Authors: Broderick J.E. , Schwartz J.E. , Shiffman S. , Hufford M.R. , Stone A.A. .
Source: Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2003 Oct; 26(2), p. 139-48.
PMID: 14534031
Related Citations

Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction.
Authors: Stone A.A. , Broderick J.E. , Schwartz J.E. , Shiffman S. , Litcher-Kelly L. , Calvanese P. .
Source: Pain, 2003 Jul; 104(1-2), p. 343-51.
PMID: 12855344
Related Citations

Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries.
Authors: Stone A.A. , Shiffman S. , Schwartz J.E. , Broderick J.E. , Hufford M.R. .
Source: Controlled clinical trials, 2003 Apr; 24(2), p. 182-99.
PMID: 12689739
Related Citations

Patient non-compliance with paper diaries.
Authors: Stone A.A. , Shiffman S. , Schwartz J.E. , Broderick J.E. , Hufford M.R. .
Source: BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002-05-18; 324(7347), p. 1193-4.
PMID: 12016186
Related Citations




Back to Top