Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA271604-04 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Wisnivesky, Juan
Organization: Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
Project Title: Modeling Best Approaches for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Cancer Survivors
Fiscal Year: 2026


Abstract

The overall goal of this proposal is to identify optimal strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for survivors of breast (BC), prostate (PC) and lung (LC) cancer. All together, there are >6 million BC, PC and LC survivors in the US. While cancer is a major source of morbidity and mortality, the majority of BC and PC as well as many early-stage LC survivors die of comorbidities, particularly CVD. Cancer survivors have increased rates of both CVD risk factors as well as CVD itself, and CVD is the leading cause of death among BC and PC survivors. Among LC survivors, CVD-related deaths account for ~30% of mortality; this proportion is higher among the growing number identified with early-stage LC. In the general population, primary prevention with lipid-lowering agents (i.e., statins) and aspirin is highly effective for decreasing CVD incidence and mortality, but these guidelines for primary CVD prevention cannot be extrapolated to cancer survivors. Approaches for CVD prevention in cancer survivors need to consider traditional risk factors (including genetic risks) for CVD as well as CVD risk from certain cancer treatments. Additionally, competing risks from cancer recurrence or comorbidities may limit the long-term benefits of primary CVD prevention. Finally, the cancer itself, cancer treatment-related complications, and a higher prevalence of comorbidities can negatively impact quality-of-life and attenuate the absolute improvement in quality-adjusted life expectancy and the cost effectiveness (CE) of primary CVD prevention. Lack of specific data applicable to cancer survivors has profound negative impact, resulting in worse cardiovascular outcomes. It is unlikely that randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the benefits of CVD preventive strategies for cancer survivors will be ever conducted. Thus, there is an urgent need to use alternative methods to optimize preventive care recommendations for this growing population. We propose using simulation modeling, an approach complementary to clinical trials, to assess the harms, benefits, and CE of CVD prevention in a representative population of cancer survivors.



Publications

Error Notice

The database may currently be offline for maintenance and should be operational soon. If not, we have been notified of this error and will be reviewing it shortly.

We apologize for the inconvenience.
- The DCCPS Team.

Back to Top