Skip to main content

Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted.

The NIH Clinical Center (the research hospital of NIH) is open. For more details about its operating status, please visit cc.nih.gov.

Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at opm.gov.

An official website of the United States government
Grant Details

Grant Number: 1R37CA295618-01 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Issaka, Rachel
Organization: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Project Title: PROACT: Promoting Follow-Up of Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Through Multilevel Interventions
Fiscal Year: 2025


Abstract

Project Summary/Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths have continuously decreased since the early 1990's, yet populations that receive care in safety-net healthcare systems, which represent 25% of all U.S. hospitals, have relatively poorer CRC-related outcomes compared to their counterparts. Safety-net healthcare systems disproportionately care for lower socioeconomic status individuals, minoritized groups, and other populations with high CRC-mortality due to lack of access to care. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is preferred for CRC screening in safety-net healthcare systems due to low-cost and ease of completion, however only 33% to 58% of patients in safety-net healthcare systems complete a follow-up colonoscopy within 1 year of an abnormal FIT. This failure to follow- up carries a 3-fold increased risk of advanced-stage CRC and a 2-fold increased risk of dying from CRC. Greater than 6-month delays in follow-up colonoscopy are associated with an increased risk of any CRC and advanced stage CRC. Previous research has shown that obtaining a follow-up colonoscopy is a complex process for safety-net patients due to multiple barriers at multiple levels of care, including lack of transportation, fear of colonoscopy, and fragmented care in a resource-constrained health system. To address these barriers, our project aims to evaluate a multilevel intervention for follow-up colonoscopy in a safety-net healthcare system compared to usual care. This study takes advantage of several single-level interventions that have been developed, tested and implemented at Harborview Medical Center (HMC) and Kent/Des Moines (KDM) clinic, safety net health settings in Seattle, WA. These interventions include: 1) a health system- level centralized CRC program aimed to improve screening and follow-up colonoscopy, 2) a health system- level navigation to follow-up colonoscopy program, 3) a patient-level rideshare program to address transportation barriers; and 4) a patient-level video to reduce fear of colonoscopy. We propose to evaluate these interventions together as a novel, multilevel intervention that addresses multiple barriers to follow-up colonoscopy at the patient- and health system-level versus usual care (centralized CRC screening and navigation to colonoscopy). Our central hypothesis is that a multilevel intervention that addresses multiple patient- and health system-level barriers simultaneously, will significantly increase the proportion of patients who receive a follow-up colonoscopy, compared to usual care, and will be possible to implement in a safety-net setting. To test our hypothesis, we will conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of HMC and KDM safety-net patients with abnormal FIT results, randomized 1:1 to the multilevel intervention vs usual care. Our specific aims are: 1) Assess the effectiveness of the multilevel intervention at improving follow-up colonoscopy completion in a safety-net population compared to a health system-level only intervention (usual care); 2) Evaluate the facilitators and barriers to the reach, acceptability, fidelity and implementation of the multilevel intervention; and 3) Evaluate the cost of implementing the multilevel intervention in a safety-net population.



Publications


None

Back to Top