Skip to main content
An official website of the United States government
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA224545-04 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Rees, Vaughan
Organization: Harvard School Of Public Health
Project Title: Informing Anti-Tobacco Communications with Affective and Decision Science: Application of the Appraisal Tendency Framework
Fiscal Year: 2022


PROJECT SUMMARY / ABSTRACT Recent decades have witnessed an explosion of scientific research on emotion and decision making. This project aims to harness insights from this burgeoning body of research to develop a theoretically-grounded and empirically-tested foundation for improving the effectiveness of emotionally-evocative public service announcements (PSAs) that target smoking. PSAs constitute a cornerstone in federal- and state- funded cancer control efforts, but large gaps exist in understanding how and for whom emotionally-evocative PSAs are effective, revealing a critical need for research. Although anti-smoking PSAs can be effective at a population level, some evidence shows that they can also trigger unintended “boomerang” effects. Moreover, results of previous studies on human emotions suggest that PSAs that induce sadness may ironically increase smokers’ impatience for and valuation of cigarettes. Likewise, although many PSAs are designed to evoke feelings such as sadness, few, if any, systematic studies have taken a theory-guided and empirically rigorous approach to testing which specific emotions will trigger which behavioral effects. Research drawing on the widely-applied Appraisal Tendency Framework (Lerner & Keltner, 2000; 2001) provides a basis for such emotion specific effects. Applying this framework, this project will conduct three studies that compare the effects of sadness versus gratitude (and control emotions of similar valence to each) on immediate and long-term smoking behavior. We select sadness because our previous research reveals that sadness increases temporal discount rate (i.e., impatience), and contrast it with gratitude, which decreases temporal discount rate. We also select sadness because our formative research reveals that it is the most frequently evoked negative emotion in the Centers for Disease Control’s anti-tobacco public service campaign. In Study 1, we will assess the specific effects of sadness and gratitude on impatience for immediate smoking reward among a nationally representative web-based sample. To test for emotion specificity, we contrast sadness with disgust and gratitude with happiness. To understand for whom emotion induction yields greatest impact, we will conduct moderation analyses assessing social and demographic factors that predispose individuals to higher smoking risk. In Study 2a, we will assess the effect of sadness and gratitude on temporal discounting of immediate smoking reward, valuation of cigarettes, and smoking cognitions and behaviors. In Study 2b, we will assess the cumulative effect on cessation behavior of repeated exposure to emotion induction (x 4) over a 90-day period. The project will provide a theoretically-grounded framework for more precise prediction of the outcomes of exposure to PSAs. It will also provide a scientific base for future development of PSAs to reduce tobacco use and promote cancer prevention. Finally, because the project includes an interdisciplinary team representing public health, emotion science, decision science, economics, and statistics, the research integrates insights from multiple literatures.


Feeling uncertain despite knowing the risk: Patients with OCD (but not controls) experience known and unknown probabilistic decisions as similarly distressing and uncertain.
Authors: Jacoby R.J. , Szkutak A. , Shin J. , Lerner J. , Wilhelm S. .
Source: Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 2023 Oct; 39, .
EPub date: 2023-09-18.
PMID: 38249753
Related Citations

Author Correction: A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Wang K. , Goldenberg A. , Dorison C.A. , Miller J.K. , Uusberg A. , Lerner J.S. , Gross J.J. , Agesin B.B. , Bernardo M. , Campos O. , et al. .
Source: Nature human behaviour, 2022 Sep; 6(9), p. 1318-1319.
PMID: 36002766
Related Citations

Staying the course: Decision makers who escalate commitment are trusted and trustworthy.
Authors: Dorison C.A. , Umphres C.K. , Lerner J.S. .
Source: Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2022 Apr; 151(4), p. 960-965.
EPub date: 2021-09-02.
PMID: 34472961
Related Citations

Balancing Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes in the Real World.
Authors: Cohen J.E. , Krishnan-Sarin S. , Eissenberg T. , Gould T.J. , Berman M.L. , Bhatnagar A. , Barnett T.E. , Soule E. , Popova L. , Tan A.S.L. , et al. .
Source: American journal of public health, 2022 Feb; 112(2), p. e1-e2.
PMID: 35080942
Related Citations

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Wang K. , Goldenberg A. , Dorison C.A. , Miller J.K. , Uusberg A. , Lerner J.S. , Gross J.J. , Agesin B.B. , Bernardo M. , Campos O. , et al. .
Source: Nature human behaviour, 2021 Aug; 5(8), p. 1089-1110.
EPub date: 2021-08-02.
PMID: 34341554
Related Citations

We are in This Together: Promoting Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Tobacco Research for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations.
Authors: Dermody S.S. , Heffner J.L. , Hinds J.T. , McQuoid J. , Quisenberry A.J. , Tan A.S.L. , Vogel E.A. .
Source: Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020-12-12; 22(12), p. 2276-2279.
PMID: 32335682
Related Citations

Sadness, but not all negative emotions, heightens addictive substance use.
Authors: Dorison C.A. , Wang K. , Rees V.W. , Kawachi I. , Ericson K.M.M. , Lerner J.S. .
Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020-01-14; 117(2), p. 943-949.
EPub date: 2019-12-30.
PMID: 31888990
Related Citations

Back to Top