||5R01CA210625-05 Interpret this number
||Medical University Of South Carolina
||A Naturalistic Nationwide Randomized Study of E-Cigarette Uptake and Consequences
Electronic (e-)cigarettes are by far the fastest growing segment of the non-combustible tobacco market
available to smokers. Most studies of e-cigarettes are 1) lab-based studies of either pharmacokinetics or
toxicant exposure 2) cross-sectional studies of prevalence and predictors of use or, more rarely, 3)
uncontrolled cohort studies. The three randomized studies to date, all based outside the US, are cessation-
focused and thus do not say anything about the natural process by which smokers adopt e-cigarettes, and how
such adoption changes smoking behavior. Studies of naturalistic, self-determined used are important to
understand real-world impact of e-cigarettes. Many of the existing studies are limited by methodological issues
that constrain interpretation: selection bias resulting from comparisons of self-selected users vs. non-users,
retrospective or cross-sectional designs that inhibit causal inferences, absence of biomarkers of exposure,
and/or insufficient sample size. The absence of prospective, randomized but still ecological studies is a glaring
omission in the literature. In fact, there has yet to be a study that a) randomizes smokers to e-cigarettes vs.
not, b) is focused on naturalistic outcomes that occur in real time, c) is prospective, with sufficient follow-up
duration, d) provides data on nicotine/tobacco exposure, e) is of sufficient sample size, and f) is US-based, an
important consideration given upcoming regulatory changes. We know of no published study with even two of
We propose a nationwide randomized clinical trial in which smokers (N=660) are randomized to receive
samples of e-cigarettes vs. not. Randomization will be 2:1 to increase precision of uptake outcomes (Aim 1).
A subset of smokers (n=120) will be recruited locally, to assess the impact of e-cigarette use on biomarkers of
exposure (Aim 2). Finally, though ours is not a cessation study, it would be a missed opportunity if we did not
track cessation outcomes (Aim 3) or sufficiently power the trial to detect differences if they emerge. Thus, our
study is designed and powered to address a comprehensive set of outcomes along three themes: 1) uptake
and patterns of use, 2) biomarkers of exposure, and 3) changes in smoking. Importantly, these, dynamic
changes will be captured in real time as they naturally unfold.
We believe this will be the best test to date of the naturalistic population impact of e-cigarettes. Methods are
strengthened by 1) large sample size (the largest e-cigarette RCT), 2) nationwide recruitment, with 3) locally
recruited subset to assess biomarkers, and 4) multiple measures of outcome. The strong investigative team,
coupled with our success in prior studies using similar methodology, collectively enhances the probability of
success in achieving grant aims. We believe this study will offer an important contribution to the e-cigarette
literature, and offer considerable implications for tobacco control, including vital information for regulatory
agencies such as the FDA.
E-Cigarette Screening in Primary Care.
, Rojewski A.M.
, Palmer A.M.
, Baker N.L.
, Carpenter M.J.
, Smith T.T.
, Toll B.A.
American journal of preventive medicine, 2023 Sep; 65(3), p. 517-520.
Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials.
, Tomko R.L.
, McClure E.A.
, Obeid J.S.
, Carpenter M.J.
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020-12-12; 22(12), p. 2134-2140.
Vape shop owners'/managers' attitudes about CBD, THC, and marijuana legal markets.
, Getachew B.
, Pulvers K.
, Sussman S.
, Wagener T.L.
, Meyers C.
, Park A.
, Dorvil S.
, Patterson A.
, Weber A.
, et al.
Preventive medicine reports, 2020 Dec; 20, p. 101208.
E-cigarette regulation: a delicate balance for public health.
, Hébert E.T.
, Stevens E.M.
, Wagener T.L.
Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020 Dec; 115(12), p. 2197-2199.