Skip Navigation
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA102695-05 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Weinberg, David
Organization: Fox Chase Cancer Center
Project Title: Two Delivery Channels to Improve Crc Screening
Fiscal Year: 2009
Back to top


Abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Fewer than 50% of the average risk population adheres to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Women are less likely than men to participate, despite suffering greater disease burden. Efforts to promote screening have displayed limited success, highlighting the need for novel approaches. The routine Ob/Gyn visit may represent an untapped screening resource. This application targets average risk women (N=1500) attending their Ob/Gyn appointment. The main goal is to compare the effect on screening of pre-visit preparatory messages delivered in electronical versus printed format. Participants will be randomized to receive an e-LETTER (email linked to a personalized website), a traditional PRINT message or nothing (usual care-DC). Both interventions provide similar information, but the e-LETTER will contain hotlinks to additional resources. Participants will be equally likely to receive their electronic or print messages matched or mismatched to their attentional style (high v. low monitoring) as defined by the C-SHIP model. This randomized controlled trial has 4 aims: 1) To compare the effect of 2 delivery channels on CRC screening rates for women attending routine Ob/GYN visits; 2) To explore the moderating role of attentional style on the impact of the interventions; 3) To examine the mediating effect of cognitive-affective factors related to screening; 4) To investigate the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Hypotheses include: 1) The e-LETTER will have a greater positive impact on screening rates than PRINT or UC; 2) Receipt of messages "matched" to attentional style will be more effective than "mismatched" messages; 3) Both interventions will improve cognitive-affective factors related to CRC screening; and 4) e-LETTER should prove most cost-effective due to its presumed fixed costs. CRC screening adherence will be assessed at 4 months. Psychosocial measures will be obtained at baseline, 4 and 12 months. It is predicted that e-LETTER, will produce the greatest increase in screening given its immediacy and greater accessibility to related informational links. PRINT messages will increase screening over UC. Receipt of messages matched to attentional style (e.g. low monitor receives low monitor message) will be more effective than mismatched messages. Finally, electronic interventions will be more cost-effective. In summary, this proposal compares the utility of web-based and printed educational interventions to increase CRC screening. Using the routine Ob/Gyn visit, the efficacy of tailored messages will be assessed. The e-LETTER potentially represents a dissemination channel for information that is rapid, user-friendly, and cost-effective. If successful, subsequent efforts could explore the effect of more elaborate Internet sites.

Back to top


Publications

A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.
Authors: Weinberg DS, Keenan E, Ruth K, Devarajan K, Rodoletz M, Bieber EJ
Source: JAMA Intern Med, 2013 Jan 28;173(2), p. 122-9.
PMID: 23128366
Related Citations

Back to top


Build it, and will they come? Unexpected findings from a study on a Web-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.
Authors: Fleisher L, Kandadai V, Keenan E, Miller SM, Devarajan K, Ruth KJ, Rodoletz M, Bieber EJ, Weinberg DS
Source: J Health Commun, 2012;17(1), p. 41-53.
EPub date: 2011 Jun 22.
PMID: 22217118
Related Citations

Back to top


Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention.
Authors: Weinberg DS, Miller S, Rodoletz M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Buzaglo J, Keenan E, Marks J, Bieber E
Source: J Cancer Educ, 2009;24(3), p. 225-32.
PMID: 19526412
Related Citations

Back to top