Skip Navigation
National Institutes of Health: National Cancer Institute: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
Grant Details

Grant Number: 5R01CA124404-05 Interpret this number
Primary Investigator: Brownson, Ross
Organization: Washington University
Project Title: Cancer Control Dissemination Research Among State-Level Policy Makers
Fiscal Year: 2011
Back to top


Abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Background. Existing cancer control knowledge is not systematically disseminated and applied-state-level policy makers are in positions to affect programs and services related to cancer control. Environmental and policy interventions show great promise for reducing the cancer burden. Goal. Our primary goal is to increase the dissemination of evidence-based interventions to control cancer, primarily focusing on the uptake of effective environmental and policy approaches among state-level policy makers. Methods and evaluation. To advance dissemination science, our approach evaluates data ("usual care") and narrative approaches. Data-based approaches are used by health experts typically trained to summarize scientific information using empirical statistics and facts. Narrative dissemination turns scientific data into compelling stones showing how evidence-based interventions can affect the daily lives of people. These narrative forms of communication are emerging as important tools for cancer prevention and control. This project will occur in two parts. Phase 1 research involves an individually-randomized experiment in which delivery methods (data versus narrative) are compared among three key groups of policy makers: legislators, legislative staffers, and executive branch administrative leaders. Phase 2 builds on Phase 1, using a group-randomized effectiveness experiment to actively disseminate evidence-based cancer control interventions in 10 states (along with 10 control states). In Phase 2, we extend our work to practitioners, who are important conduits to legislative branch leaders and senior administrators in the executive branch. Dissemination activities in Phase 2 include tool development (e.g., policy briefs), skill enhancement (e.g., dissemination workshops), and application (e.g., enhanced awareness of evidence-based interventions). Evaluation of Phase 2 interventions will rely on three sources of data: 1) measures of dissemination based on self-reported surveys from practitioners; 2) review and abstraction of state-level cancer control records; and 3) a content analysis of relevant state-level legislation (both introduced and enacted bills). We also will conduct process evaluation. Dissemination and innovations. Concurrent with Phase 2, we will begin efforts to design for dissemination. The intent of these activities is to ensure that findings from our grant are useful, relevant, and ready for widespread dissemination when funding ends. We will assemble and work with an advisory group, capture project costs, conduct qualitative case studies, and sponsor a dissemination conference. Policy-relevant dissemination of evidence-based practice is highly innovative yet is an area that remains largely uncharted. Our project advances the field by better understanding the role of narrative communication in shaping policy. Relevance. This project is relevant to public health because it addresses behaviors that lead to significant premature cancer morbidity and mortality. Sparse knowledge exists regarding effective approaches for dissemination of research-tested interventions among "real world" policy audiences. Upon completion, our study will provide policy-relevant dissemination strategies that can be adapted to other settings and risk factors.

Back to top


Publications

Uses of Research Evidence by State Legislators Who Prioritize Behavioral Health Issues.
Authors: Purtle J. , Dodson E.A. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2016-07-01; , p. appips201500443.
EPub date: 2016-7-01.
PMID: 27364817
Related Citations

State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.
Authors: Dodson E.A. , Geary N.A. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Health education research, 2015 Dec; 30(6), p. 840-8.
EPub date: 2015-10-13.
PMID: 26464418
Related Citations

Getting research to the policy table: a qualitative study with public health researchers on engaging with policy makers.
Authors: Otten J.J. , Dodson E.A. , Fleischhacker S. , Siddiqi S. , Quinn E.L. .
Source: Preventing chronic disease, 2015; 12, p. E56.
EPub date: 2015-04-30.
PMID: 25927604
Related Citations

Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy.
Authors: Tabak R.G. , Eyler A.A. , Dodson E.A. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Public health, 2015 Jun; 129(6), p. 698-704.
EPub date: 2015-03-18.
PMID: 25795018
Related Citations

"Everyone should be able to choose how they get around": how Topeka, Kansas, passed a complete streets resolution.
Authors: Dodson E.A. , Langston M. , Cardick L.C. , Johnson N. , Clayton P. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Preventing chronic disease, 2014; 11, p. E25.
EPub date: 2014-02-20.
PMID: 24556251
Related Citations

Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures.
Authors: Rabin B.A. , Purcell P. , Naveed S. , Moser R.P. , Henton M.D. , Proctor E.K. , Brownson R.C. , Glasgow R.E. .
Source: Implementation science : IS, 2012; 7, p. 119.
EPub date: 2012-12-11.
PMID: 23231885
Related Citations

State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?
Authors: Dodson E.A. , Stamatakis K.A. , Chalifour S. , Haire-Joshu D. , McBride T. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP, 2013 Jan-Feb; 19(1), p. 25-9.
PMID: 23169400
Related Citations

A review of obesity-themed policy briefs.
Authors: Dodson E.A. , Eyler A.A. , Chalifour S. , Wintrode C.G. .
Source: American journal of preventive medicine, 2012 Sep; 43(3 Suppl 2), p. S143-8.
PMID: 22898164
Related Citations

Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.
Authors: Tabak R.G. , Khoong E.C. , Chambers D.A. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: American journal of preventive medicine, 2012 Sep; 43(3), p. 337-50.
PMID: 22898128
Related Citations

Methods of generating state revenue for breast cancer prevention and early detection: an analysis of pink dollars.
Authors: Eyler A.A. , Dodson E.A. , Chalifour S. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2011 Sep-Oct; 126(5), p. 733-40.
PMID: 21886334
Related Citations

Communicating evidence-based information on cancer prevention to state-level policy makers.
Authors: Brownson R.C. , Dodson E.A. , Stamatakis K.A. , Casey C.M. , Elliott M.B. , Luke D.A. , Wintrode C.G. , Kreuter M.W. .
Source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011-02-16; 103(4), p. 306-16.
EPub date: 2011-01-06.
PMID: 21212381
Related Citations

Measuring the impact of public health policy.
Authors: Brownson R.C. , Seiler R. , Eyler A.A. .
Source: Preventing chronic disease, 2010 Jul; 7(4), p. A77.
EPub date: 2010-06-15.
PMID: 20550835
Related Citations

Communicating prevention messages to policy makers: the role of stories in promoting physical activity.
Authors: Stamatakis K.A. , McBride T.D. , Brownson R.C. .
Source: Journal of physical activity & health, 2010 Mar; 7 Suppl 1, p. S99-107.
PMID: 20440020
Related Citations

Understanding evidence-based public health policy.
Authors: Brownson R.C. , Chriqui J.F. , Stamatakis K.A. .
Source: American journal of public health, 2009 Sep; 99(9), p. 1576-83.
EPub date: 2009-07-16.
PMID: 19608941
Related Citations