|Grant Number:||5R01CA132709-04 Interpret this number|
|Primary Investigator:||Feldstein, Adrianne|
|Organization:||Kaiser Foundation Research Institute|
|Project Title:||Focusing Implementation to Bring Effective Reminders: Fiber|
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The Focusing Implementation to Bring Effective Reminders (FIBER) mixed-methods 4-year study will evaluate the implementation of a large-scale population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening patient reminder program and coordinated follow-up. FIBER will use the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), developed by the investigators, to guide the analyses. PRISM considers elements within the intervention design, external environment, intervention implementation and maintenance infrastructure, and characteristics of the adopting organization and its patients that are associated with program Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (the RE-AIM evaluation framework). Primary aims: Among health plan members aged 50-80 who are due for colorectal cancer screening (n= 50,000); their primary care provider (PCP) teams (n=265); consulting specialists, and key staff (n=45); and key health care managers and staff (n=10) in 15 medical centers in Oregon and Washington: 1. To determine the Effectiveness and Maintenance of a CRC screening patient reminder program by conducting a practical randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n= 6000) to evaluate the short-term effect of program implementation on CRC screening and the cost per additional CRC screen, and using a longitudinal cohort study of CRC screening (n=44,000 patients not in the RCT) to estimate the longer- term effectiveness and costs of the program at the PCP team level. 2. To elucidate patient, PCP team, and system factors important to implementation success 3. To describe and explain the CRC screening patient reminder program Reach (to diverse patients), Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, guided by the PRISM, to empower implementation improvements for further evaluation. 4. To create, refine, and disseminate an implementation guide for CRC screening reminder programs by combining the findings from Aims 1-3 and the perspectives from informant interviews of key staff at three future dissemination-implementation sites.
Automated Telephone Calls Improved Completion Of Fecal Occult Blood Testing
Authors: Mosen D.M. , Feldstein A.C. , Perrin N. , Rosales A.G. , Smith D.H. , Liles E.G. , Schneider J.L. , Lafata J.E. , Myers R.E. , Kositch M. , et al. .
Source: Medical Care, 2010 Jul; 48(7), p. 604-10.
Primary Care Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation Patterns: Associated Factors And Screening Outcomes
Authors: Feldstein A.C. , Perrin N. , Liles E.G. , Smith D.H. , Rosales A.G. , Schneider J.L. , Lafata J.E. , Myers R.E. , Mosen D.M. , Glasgow R.E. .
Source: Medical Decision Making : An International Journal Of The Society For Medical Decision Making, 2012 Jan-Feb; 32(1), p. 198-208.
Change To Fit Increased Crc Screening Rates: Evaluation Of A Us Screening Outreach Program
Authors: Liles E.G. , Perrin N. , Rosales A.G. , Feldstein A.C. , Smith D.H. , Mosen D.M. , Schneider J.L. .
Source: The American Journal Of Managed Care, 2012 Oct; 18(10), p. 588-95.
Automated Telephone Calls To Enhance Colorectal Cancer Screening: Economic Analysis
Authors: Smith D.H. , Feldstein A.C. , Perrin N. , Rosales A.G. , Mosen D.M. , Liles E.G. , Schneider J.L. , Lafata J.E. , Meyers R.E. , Glasgow R.E. .
Source: The American Journal Of Managed Care, 2012 Nov; 18(11), p. 691-9.
More Comprehensive Discussion Of Crc Screening Associated With Higher Screening
Authors: Mosen D.M. , Feldstein A.C. , Perrin N.A. , Rosales A.G. , Smith D.H. , Liles E.G. , Schneider J.L. , Meyers R.E. , Elston-Lafata J. .
Source: The American Journal Of Managed Care, 2013 Apr; 19(4), p. 265-71.